Sometimes it lags, especially when working with. Has anyone already gone down that route? If you know one way or the other whether Camtasia files would work in the virtual environment, it'd sure save us some time and effort to know about that, before we get into a deep investigation ourselves. What do you dislike ts true that Camtasia is quite simpler than Adobe Captivate, but it gets the work done. Since we're now at serious risk of losing this major client, we're about to download an evaluation copy of Camtasia, to see if it produces files that can be used in the Virtual Desktop environment. (Individual users don't need to CREATE Captivate material - just VIEW the files that we create and that get posted on the server.) Due to the fact that I purchased this for education purposes, and educational prices have gone up exponentially, it has been difficult even at 179 to upgrade, as an educator and the organization is not always willing to reimburse the purchase, it would have. The Captivate swf files we produced for this client for the past several years worked perfectly when streamed from a server in that individual desktop environment, but they don't work in the Virtual Desktop environment - the audio stutters and stops, even when we set the audio quality as low as possible when publishing in Captivate5 (32kbps, 44.1KHz). Camtasia is so easy to use that I recommend it over Adobe Premiere, Captivate, Storyline, and other tools. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to. Our main client has recently migrated from supporting several hundred individual desktop machines, to a Virtual Desktop environment where software runs on a server and individual users access it from their minimally configured systems. Camtasia is so easy to use that I recommend it over Adobe Premiere, Captivate, Storyline, and other tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |